A clearer view of
what comes next.
Researching high-performance weather forecasting through quantum reservoir computing and classical HPC.
Enter the weather workbenchWe are building a research institution
around a question worth testing:
Can quantum dynamics help us
understand a changing atmosphere?
A window into the atmosphere.
Explore a question. Compare a scenario.
Follow every value back to its source.
Illustrative data only. These are synthetic scenarios, not real forecasts, observations or QRC results.
Eastern Norway
Oslo
10.75° E
9.0°C
Reference scenario
A synthetic value for exploring the research interface.
Scenario comparison
°C- Initialized
- 01 Oct, 00:00 UTC
- Issued
- 01 Oct, 01:00 UTC
- Valid
- 02 Oct, 00:00 UTC
- Dataset
- Norway interface study · v1.0.0
Data & provenance
Illustrative locations, not verified weather stations. No forecasts, observations or QRC model runs. Values and differences demonstrate the interface only.
- Source
- Deterministic local fixture
- Dataset ID
- qmikeai-synthetic-norway-v1
- Methods
- Synthetic reference scenario; Synthetic experimental scenario
- Geographic extent
- 4°–32° E, 57°–72° N · EPSG:4326
- Time convention
- UTC. Lead is measured from initialization. Issued time is recorded separately.
- Sampling
- Six-hour steps; values at 2 metres above the illustrative surface.
View exact scenario values
| Lead | Valid time (UTC) | Reference | Experimental | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0 h | 01 Oct, 00:00 | 9.40 | 9.40 | 0.00 |
| +6 h | 01 Oct, 06:00 | 11.09 | 11.48 | 0.39 |
| +12 h | 01 Oct, 12:00 | 9.18 | 9.85 | 0.67 |
| +18 h | 01 Oct, 18:00 | 7.28 | 8.02 | 0.75 |
| +24 h (selected) | 02 Oct, 00:00 | 8.97 | 9.58 | 0.61 |
| +30 h | 02 Oct, 06:00 | 10.66 | 10.96 | 0.30 |
| +36 h | 02 Oct, 12:00 | 8.75 | 8.65 | -0.10 |
| +42 h | 02 Oct, 18:00 | 6.84 | 6.37 | -0.47 |
| +48 h | 03 Oct, 00:00 | 8.54 | 7.83 | -0.70 |
| +54 h | 03 Oct, 06:00 | 10.23 | 9.49 | -0.74 |
| +60 h | 03 Oct, 12:00 | 8.32 | 7.77 | -0.55 |
| +66 h | 03 Oct, 18:00 | 6.41 | 6.20 | -0.21 |
| +72 h | 04 Oct, 00:00 | 8.10 | 8.30 | 0.19 |
Make sense of the signal.
From a weather signal
to a better question.
Explore the selected data, compare scenarios and sketch a validation study. Each answer keeps the context you asked about.
Deterministic local responses. Synthetic data. Proposed methods. No live weather or model inference.
DEMO MODE · Scripted responses, with no AI inference. Messages and selected synthetic context are sent to this site’s server. This demo has no saved conversation history. Synthetic data is not a weather forecast.
A working interface for a proposed study. The values are synthetic, the locations are illustrative, and no forecasting model has been executed.
From observations to understanding.
A quantum reservoir is one part of a hybrid system. Its value must be tested against strong classical alternatives, with the same information, careful validation and a complete account of cost.
Investigate whether reservoir dynamics provide useful temporal features. Distinguish simulated circuits from quantum hardware measurements. Input encoding, washout, replay, shots and measurement all contribute to cost.
From atmosphere
to airflow.
A Ferrari-inspired F1 concept, meshed with Gmsh and studied with a three-dimensional Mojo flow solver. Inspect the geometry, replay the computed fields, and see the grid behind the result. The QRC comparison remains to be run.
Explore the fluid-dynamics studyRosso F1: computed airflow
Reading the Gmsh geometry and the final Mojo snapshot. No sample flow is substituted.
Prediction is a question.
Advantage is something to measure.